How do you take neurodivergent people into account in your test constructs?
Master International's tests are not designed to diagnose or evaluate neurodivergence, but item fairness is built into test design, and Master International recommends an individual, candidate-led conversation to arrange accommodations where needed.
Master International's tests are developed for organisational purposes, so Master International does not build in a clinical or diagnostic dimension of neurodivergence. This sits outside the tools' intended use, and outside Master International's expertise as a test developer.
Fairness in Master International's test design
Master International's item-writing follows established fairness principles, following, for example, EFPA/ITC test standards, and is designed to avoid unnecessary complexity or time pressure that could disadvantage a candidate for reasons unrelated to what the assessment is measuring.
Why Master International does not offer a fixed checklist
Neurodivergence spans ADHD, autism, dyslexia, dyspraxia, and more, and even within any one of these, presentation varies enormously from person to person. This is exactly why Master International does not offer a generic recommendation or a fixed checklist tied to neurodivergent test takers. What helps one candidate with ADHD may not help another, and a one-size-fits-all approach risks missing the person in front of you.
Accommodating a known condition
Where a candidate has a known condition, this should be taken into account. Master International advises going through an individual evaluation together with the candidate on how best to accommodate the condition. A few principles are worth following:
- Keep it candidate-led and voluntary. Ask what would help them do their best, rather than asking about a diagnosis.
- Focus on function, not condition. For example, whether they concentrate better with fewer distractions or more time, or whether they normally use any support, such as assistive software, note-taking help, or instructions provided in advance, that they would like available for the assessment.
Offer this conversation consistently to every candidate, rather than singling anyone out. It normalises the offer, reduces the risk of differential treatment, and tends to surface more genuine disclosure.
Finally, whatever a candidate shares, only record what is relevant and needed to arrange the accommodation itself.